Misconceptions About Montessori
It's pretty common to hear lots of misconceptions when talking to people about Montessori. Maybe their brother's mail carrier's aunt's stepsister said that in Montessori schools, kids run wild! Maybe they just have a tendency to reject any idea that is a little bit "outside-the-box". Whatever the case, I like to view those comments as teachable moments for me and the person making them.
For instance, one woman I know told me recently that her college textbooks (an infallible authority!) said that Montessori was dangerous because kids worked mostly independently, and because Maria Montessori discouraged creativity. I have to confess, I bit my cheek to keep from laughing. She gave an example of a Montessori 3-6 preschool class that she once observed where the children worked mostly alone without talking.
To this woman, herself a traditional preschool teacher, it seemed like the very reasons for attending preschool - socialization, communication, play - were missing. What, then would be the point of Montessori? From her perspective, I can see how it would be puzzling.
I began to explain to her that that the difference between Montessori and traditional preschool went deeper than what you see on the surface. At first glance, it's easy to sum up traditional preschool as "children playing together" and Montessori as "children working alone". Is that all that's happening?
The true differences are not outwardly observable; they are philosophical, and can only be discovered by asking, "Why are the children in traditional preschool playing?" and "Why are the children in Montessori working independently?" That gets to the heart of the matter.
In Montessori we begin with the Tendencies of Man (or of Humans, as I like to say). These tendencies are dispositions towards certain actions - forces that will operate unless they are deliberately stopped. I hope to write an article on them at some point, because they deserve a detailed look, but for now I will list them. As you read - whether they are new to you or you've heard about them many times - let them resonate with your own observations of children from infancy to adulthood:
Orientation (to forge a relationship to the environment)
Order (brings predictability and security)
Exploration (using the senses to make discoveries)
Communication (includes touch, gestures, written & spoken word, art & music)
Activity (the body expresses the thoughts of the mind)
Manipulation (taking ownership of the environment by doing)
Work (work helps us feel worthwhile)
Repetition (to achieve control and mastery)
Exactness (to clarify knowledge)
Abstraction (visualize something that does not yet exist)
Perfection (what we can achieve after moving through the other tendencies)
For young children, the best way - maybe the only way - to fulfill most of these tendencies is to work alone. Indeed, you can only be sure that you have mastered a task by doing it completely alone. Otherwise there is always the other person to take into account, and how can you know how much of it was their doing?
Children in a Montessori classroom are moving through these tendencies day by day, and doing so requires an enormous amount of concentration. Naturally it is easiest to concentrate when working independently. There's nothing wrong with play - and all children should - but play alone doesn't lead a child from orientation to perfection. There's more to it than that.
Imagine that a child is given the chance to work towards order, repetition, exactness, and perfection. Will this child be an automaton, devoid of creativity? By no means! Such a solid foundation of learning will lead to an enormous amount of creativity. But the foundation must be there first. My son, if I may use him as an example, is one of the most creative kids I've ever met. From the very beginning, he has been encouraged to take hold of his environment, labeling and classifying everything he sees. Rather than stifling his creativity, it's been encouraged because he has so much information at his fingertips.
Why, then, are the children in a traditional preschool playing? Do they lack the desire to fulfill the Tendencies of Humans? Not at all! They are reacting to their environment, which is mostly filled with toys, crafts, and games. Again, nothing is wrong with toys, crafts, and games, but they are not the tools needed for the refinement of the senses and mastery of the environment. In one famous example, a Montessori directress (Paula Polk Lillard) put out a box of toys in her classroom every year, and every year the toys went virtually untouched as the children pursued the Montessori materials.
At Montessori for All you'll find some common misconceptions about Montessori, and answers for each one. The better informed we are, the better we can explain why we do what we do!
For instance, one woman I know told me recently that her college textbooks (an infallible authority!) said that Montessori was dangerous because kids worked mostly independently, and because Maria Montessori discouraged creativity. I have to confess, I bit my cheek to keep from laughing. She gave an example of a Montessori 3-6 preschool class that she once observed where the children worked mostly alone without talking.
To this woman, herself a traditional preschool teacher, it seemed like the very reasons for attending preschool - socialization, communication, play - were missing. What, then would be the point of Montessori? From her perspective, I can see how it would be puzzling.
I began to explain to her that that the difference between Montessori and traditional preschool went deeper than what you see on the surface. At first glance, it's easy to sum up traditional preschool as "children playing together" and Montessori as "children working alone". Is that all that's happening?
The true differences are not outwardly observable; they are philosophical, and can only be discovered by asking, "Why are the children in traditional preschool playing?" and "Why are the children in Montessori working independently?" That gets to the heart of the matter.
In Montessori we begin with the Tendencies of Man (or of Humans, as I like to say). These tendencies are dispositions towards certain actions - forces that will operate unless they are deliberately stopped. I hope to write an article on them at some point, because they deserve a detailed look, but for now I will list them. As you read - whether they are new to you or you've heard about them many times - let them resonate with your own observations of children from infancy to adulthood:
For young children, the best way - maybe the only way - to fulfill most of these tendencies is to work alone. Indeed, you can only be sure that you have mastered a task by doing it completely alone. Otherwise there is always the other person to take into account, and how can you know how much of it was their doing?
Children in a Montessori classroom are moving through these tendencies day by day, and doing so requires an enormous amount of concentration. Naturally it is easiest to concentrate when working independently. There's nothing wrong with play - and all children should - but play alone doesn't lead a child from orientation to perfection. There's more to it than that.
Imagine that a child is given the chance to work towards order, repetition, exactness, and perfection. Will this child be an automaton, devoid of creativity? By no means! Such a solid foundation of learning will lead to an enormous amount of creativity. But the foundation must be there first. My son, if I may use him as an example, is one of the most creative kids I've ever met. From the very beginning, he has been encouraged to take hold of his environment, labeling and classifying everything he sees. Rather than stifling his creativity, it's been encouraged because he has so much information at his fingertips.
Why, then, are the children in a traditional preschool playing? Do they lack the desire to fulfill the Tendencies of Humans? Not at all! They are reacting to their environment, which is mostly filled with toys, crafts, and games. Again, nothing is wrong with toys, crafts, and games, but they are not the tools needed for the refinement of the senses and mastery of the environment. In one famous example, a Montessori directress (Paula Polk Lillard) put out a box of toys in her classroom every year, and every year the toys went virtually untouched as the children pursued the Montessori materials.
At Montessori for All you'll find some common misconceptions about Montessori, and answers for each one. The better informed we are, the better we can explain why we do what we do!




Comments:
Lori, this is an excellent article. I have sent it on to a friend living in Germany contemplating becoming a Montessori 'teacher'.
So glad you found it worthwhile! I love to hear that =). I hope your friend decides to do Montessori!
fantastic article,i've observed both types of setting,and this topic has always puzzled me-you've put it well.
But is there anything wrong with having a sand and water table?i've heard in true montessori settings this is not allowed?
I wouldn't say that any specific material isn't "allowed" in Montessori; it just needs to be presented in a Montessori way.
Montessori kids should get plenty of water work (scrubbing, hand washing) without needing a sand/water table, which is primarily for play. There's no "steps" to doing a sand/water table.
Most kids will have one at home, whereas school should be just Montessori work. If you're homeschooling with Montessori, just keep the sand/water table for playtime.
Hi,
I recently came across an article which spoke about not making your child depend too much on concrete mathematics from an early age as this can then debilitate them in applying abstract thinking especially in relation to maths.There was no research to support the evidence,but what they did say was that great mathematicians of the past had an amazing ability to think and apply mathematical principles using mostly their head.
This confused me quite a bit as I know Montessori has the opposite approach.
I'd be really happy to hear your thoughts on this and if you know any articles related.
Thank you!
I think the key word is "depend". In Montessori, children use the concrete materials but do not depend upon them.
There are very specific steps to moving towards abstraction. The materials are not used forever. I will use my son as an example, because I've been observing him up close for years now, but I've seen this happen with many other kids too.
Basically, he started using the multiplication bead board when he was 5 1/2. He used it for about 6-8 months, not every day or even every week, but every so often. At some point, he began to internalize the multiplication tables and started using flashcards to practice his fact rather than needing the board anymore. Now, he knows his multiplication facts by memory.
Here's the key: there are probably other second graders like my son who know their multiplication facts by memory too. The difference is, he actually understands the "why" of the multiplication tables. So while both Montessori and non-Montessori kids end up being able to perform calculations in their heads, the Montessori kids understand the mechanics behind the equations.
Because kids have a grounding in exactly what is happening when they perform a math operation, when they are older they are able to understand very complicated math concepts fairly easily.
The article you mention was engaging in a logical fallacy. It's very possible that these mathematicians would have been able to perform these calculations in their heads even if they were introduced to concrete materials. It's the fallacy of thinking that because one thing precedes another, it must have caused it (post hoc, ergo propter hoc).
The last point I'll make (I promise!) is that Maria Montessori was more of a scientist than an educator in many ways. She observed the children rather than simply using conventional wisdom to teach them. Based on her scientific observations, kids do better in math when they start with concrete materials and move towards abstraction than they do when presented with abstract concepts only.
Thankyou for sharing your thoughts,I'm hoping to use the montessori maths materials with my daughter-I think the key word you mentioned-not to'depend'is important.I suppose it would be difficult to find a child who didn't use their fingers to count,until they were confident enough to count mentally
Well I can't wait to show the materials to my daughter,just looking at the maths materials makes one thirsty to begin learning.
It's really interesting to hear about your son and how he progressed with the materials...If you have other experiences/case studies you wouldn't mind sharing i'd love to hear,for example children working with the moveable alphabet,how they then progressed to fluent reading etc....I just loved reading the diary entries written by a Montessori teacher-think author is paula lillard??!
Sorry for the long comment!!
thank's once again!
Post a Comment
<< Home